TASTESYSTEMS
Open navigation
Taste Systems / Context System
Context systems for cross-functional AI workHero 02

Organization-wide Context is hard: Your AI CollaborationBottleneck

Turn scattered tribal knowledge into a compounding learning loop.

Landscape / Geometry / Event
01 / Recognition

As AI spreads, shared context becomes the constraint.

One team updates the truth. Each retelling loses part of the original signal.

Every handoff is a copy. A complete piece of context is progressively distorted, fragmented, and lost as five people relay it from memory.
02 / Ownership + dependencies

Each team owns what it knows. The system governs what others depend on.

Before / Human routing
SalesMarketingEngineering???
After / Owned release
SalesMarketingEngineeringCore context

The ruleLocal judgment stays local. Coordination begins when someone else depends on it.

03 / Compounding loop

Every decision starts with the full record.

Marketing learns. Sales uses it. The result returns with the reasoning attached.

Marketing learns

A customer objection changes the message.

  1. Marketing learns
  2. Owner reviews
  3. Release
  4. Sales uses
  5. Evidence returns
Marketing learns, an owner reviews, an approved release reaches Sales, and the resulting evidence returns to inform the next release.
04 / How I help

Software carries the context. The operating model keeps it dependable.

I build both, then fit them to the AI tools and working habits your teams already use.

01 / Software infrastructure
  • Versioned context packages with explicit dependencies
  • Permission-aware search and query from approved releases
  • Access through the AI tools, files, APIs, and MCP your teams already use
02 / Operating model
  • A named owner for every shared package
  • Evidence, review, versions, and releases
  • Adoption and team enablement built around real work
Permissioning / responsibility boundaries

The right context reaches the right role through the surface they already use.

Power users work through the full Git lifecycle. Everyone else reads approved packages through familiar tools.

MCP + API / scoped
Subscribe / read
Review / release
Approved
context
Domain owners and contributors write and review shared context. Subscribed teams and agents receive approved releases through the surfaces they already use, with access scoped to their role.
01

Domain owners

Git lifecycle + Claude

Write, review, and release the context closest to their work.

02

Contributors

Claude + files

Propose scoped changes with source evidence attached.

03

Subscribed teams

Claude, ChatGPT + web

Read approved packages owned by the teams they depend on.

04

Agents + workflows

MCP + API

Receive only the approved runtime context they are permitted to use.

Git is available to power users. It is not mandatory for everyone else.
05 / Rollout

Start with one team. Prove the second can build on it.

Prove one real dependency, then transfer the system to the people who will keep improving it.

  1. 01 / complete

    Map

    Choose 3–5 priority use cases and work backward to the context each one depends on.

  2. 02 / active

    Install

    Build the first owned package, review path, approved release, and access surfaces.

  3. 03 / pending

    Prove

    A second team uses the first team’s approved work without starting over.

  4. 04 / pending

    Transfer

    Your internal owner runs and improves the next release without me.

06 / Previous work

Break down the problem. Formalize what works. Automate the overhead.

The Nickel work proves the implementation discipline beneath this service—not a completed company-wide release model.

Nickel / source-grounded foundation

300 hours of sales calls became a context foundation people could actually use.

Read the Nickel case study
07 / Fit + action

This is relevant when shared context is now the constraint.

This is infrastructure for an expanding cross-functional mandate—not an expensive answer to one bounded workflow.

01 / fit signal

Useful AI work already exists

Adoption, visibility, and operating habits still vary by team.

02 / fit signal

Teams use incompatible context

The ICP, buyer language, strategy, or product truth changes depending on who asks.

03 / fit signal

Governance is now the harder problem

You can build another agent more easily than you can define ownership, permissions, releases, and adoption beneath it.

If a simple shared file or bounded integration solves the problem, use it. A Context System is warranted when the dependencies cross teams, tools, and release boundaries.

Perspective, then scope

Name the outcome. Find the context dependency.

We can compare notes, determine whether the problem is structural, and use the smallest intervention that fits.

Start a fit conversation